JUST because the rainbow flags are packed away and the relentless propaganda of Delight Month involves an finish, up pops Drag Queen Story Hour UK, a sequence of just about 70 occasions at council libraries throughout the nation.
These are accompanied, inevitably, by a band of half-witted mother and father trumpeting their participation. I don’t wish to be uncharitable, however they are often described solely as helpful idiots; facilitators of a trigger they haven’t even begun to grasp.
How else to learn, for instance, Stella Creasy’s latest celebratory tweet: ‘What a beautiful afternoon with Drag Story Hour UK immediately with the fantastic Greta who put a lot power into story telling and entertaining native kids – Proud too that Walthamstow a group that welcomes and celebrates pleasure with the Morris Gallery on this beautiful approach! 
’
It’s silly, within the first occasion, to suppose that these occasions have something to do with Delight. After all, the Drag Queen Story Hour UK web site makes an attempt to make this hyperlink with its rainbow typeface and a few outdated (March 2011) statistics about LGBT+.
To consider, nonetheless, that’s some homespun, natural initiative, grown out of the homosexual rights motion, is to be naive. It’s a part of a political agenda to destabilise our kids and it doesn’t take a lot digging to unearth its pernicious roots.
As with so most of the worst concepts inflicted on immediately’s society, and particularly our younger folks, the origins may be positioned in academia. There are a variety of scholarly papers advocating for Drag Queen Story Hour, the place the clear objective of those occasions is ‘to queer’ our kids.
As one such paper places it: ‘We’re guided by the next query: what would possibly Drag Queen Story Hour supply educators as a approach of bringing queer methods of figuring out and being into the training of younger kids? “Queer”, on this context, doesn’t imply “homosexual”. Fairly, it means something that doesn’t signify normalcy. “Queer” is . . . no matter is at odds with the conventional, the authentic, the dominant. There may be nothing particularly to which it essentially refers. It’s an id with out an essence.’
Why would educators want to confuse our kids on this approach? Why would they need our most weak to have ‘an id with out an essence’? James Lindsay, in his New Discourses podcast on the infiltration of Queer Concept into our faculties, says: ‘It’s a long-running venture rooted in Marxist concept . . . the Marxists get to destabilise id, they get to destabilise psychology and due to this fact they get politically groomable folks that they’ll deliver right into a disaffected – dissatisfied and mentally in poor health – state that they’ll then manipulate into being revolutionary in direction of their trigger.’
In a nutshell, if our kids lack any sense of id and are, on the similar time, instilled with a way of dissatisfaction, then they’re ripe for political activism. If they’ve been schooled in neo-Marxist theories, it’s for this ideology that they may agitate.
It’s maybe value noting, at this level, that I’m not essentially ascribing these motives to the organisers of Drag Queen Story Hour UK. In truth, I’d be shocked in the event that they have been conscious of this scholarship. My suspicion is that they belong in the identical class as these mother and father who naively leap on the bandwagon. They’re pawns for these with extra sinister intentions.
Can the likes of Creasy be excused, then? Nicely, there nonetheless stays the query of primary frequent sense. Which oldsters of their proper thoughts would put their kids on the toes of a person dressed as a sexualised lady?
In an age the place Sunday faculty academics need to go a DBS examine and undergo rigorous safeguarding coaching, why do these perverse book-reading occasions not ring even the tiniest alarm bell? Considerations about undermining childhood innocence and the blurring of boundaries needs to be instinctive when mixing kids with males in drag.
For the right-minded, after all, the risks are apparent. Dad and mom for Schooling have described the method at work: ‘Youngsters are uncovered to “queerness” to destabilise their sense of self, to assist them turn out to be free through a frequently fluid state of sexual id. Normative boundaries that forestall the sexual abuse of kids are framed as oppressing kids’s sexuality, and arguments are made that kids need, and may consent to sexual relations with adults.’
Once more, I’m not questioning the motives of particular person organisers or individuals. I merely don’t know what their specific intentions are, however the large image have to be understood.
Surprising as they have been, the phrases of Drag Queen Ms Sharon Le Grand on the Nationwide Theatre’s River Stage household pageant have been no shock: ‘We have to educate our kids to open their hearts, educate kids to open their minds and to show our kids to open their legs.’ The mother and father who took their kids to the present in June mustn’t have anticipated anything.
That is no accident. It has been crafted in academia and compelled into lecture rooms and kids’s libraries throughout our nation. Promoted by malevolent forces, it’s facilitated by helpful, bandwagon-jumping fools. It’s for the remainder of us to push again, expose the fact and resist with no matter means are at our disposal.
It’s encouraging that there have been protests towards Drag Queen Story Hour in Studying and Bristol. I hope the discerning will proceed to lift their voices, for it’s not controversial to object to a drag queen in your little one’s faculty or library. It’s easy frequent sense.
