PLEASE ship your letters (as brief as you want) to data@conservativewoman.co.uk and mark them ‘for potential publication’. We want your title and if potential, a county handle, eg Yorkshire or London. We are going to embrace biographical particulars in the event you volunteer them. Letters could also be shortened.
***
We don’t have a ‘Conservative’ Get together any extra
Expensive Editor
What is occurring within the Conservative Get together? They need a brand new management between Rishi Sunak, who supported lockdowns and argued in opposition to them solely when it was politically expedient and a yr and a half too late, and likes the thought of a digital monetary system beneath the management of presidency like China’s social credit score, and Penny Mordaunt, who can’t outline what a lady is and is finest buds with Invoice Gates.
I’m coming to the conclusion that we don’t have a ‘Conservative’ Get together.
Are we to spend the remainder of the occasion’s time period in workplace having consecutive management bids from PM candidates who haven’t gained a basic election?
In the meantime folks can’t afford to warmth their houses. Ministers have to get on with the job and run the nation.
Lucy Murphy
***
Tory MPs are extra like a wing of the Labour Get together
Expensive Editor
When Conservative MPs is not going to respect their members’ alternative of occasion chief and prime minister; when they won’t respect their voters’ wishes for agency management of immigration, for legislation and order and for rewarding arduous graft; after they have supplied no resistance to the reckless improve in authorities borrowing and the nationwide debt to the unprecedented sum of £3trillion; after they zealously pursue the financially and economically ruinous coverage of Internet Zero; when yr after yr they’re content material for the BBC to pump out left-wing propaganda and set the political agenda; when they won’t problem the progressive insurance policies carried out by civil servants in open defiance of their authorities; when they may defend neither freedom of speech nor any socially conservative trigger; when they’re content material to be in workplace however not in energy; when they’re extra excited about preventing one another than the opposition; certainly, after they act extra like a wing of the Labour occasion than like its opponents, why ought to I lend my vote to the Conservative Get together?
Otto Inglis
Fife
***
Preventing again in opposition to Pfizer
Expensive Editor
There have been some good items on Covid this week. I used to be notably incensed by the Pfizer Govt’s jocund admission that they didn’t know if their product prevented transmission, previous to launch. Numerous excessive profile commentators mentioned that “prison investigations” and “prosecutions” ought to observe.
Who would provoke these? I don’t assume any authorized authorities, wherever, wish to rock the boat. Nevertheless, if an skilled lawyer had been to suggest an motion in opposition to Pfizer, then if there was a crowdfunding attraction for the price I’d very probably contribute. It’s time to battle again, and this may be a technique we are able to do it.
Anybody know a superb lawyer?
Roland O’Brien
West Sussex
***
The BBC licence charge revolt is rising
Expensive Editor
I’ve not used the BBC for the reason that worry propaganda started in December 2019, when my licence elapsed. Since then I’ve obtained more and more threatening letters, very very like a Harry Potter Howler, whereby unnamed folks will flip up at my dwelling and demand entry! I made a decision that I’d take comparable motion in opposition to the BBC and have despatched the hooked up letter with an bill for my time. Would possibly I recommend that it’s a tactic all non-licence holders might undertake, as it’s going to maintain their buyer providers and income director busy, and maybe they may even get the message.
Tracy Jones
Operations Director
TV Licensing
Darlington
DL98 1TL
Expensive Sir,
Re: Official Discover – Bill for Companies
Please discover hooked up an bill for providers to TV Licensing and the BBC.
That is for providers not utilised by your Company or by the outsourced debt assortment company, one of many many funded by the taxpayer. You might word that, irritating as it’s to myself, the non-payment for these providers not utilized by your companies have as but not pressured me to resort to harassment, threats or different such behaviour – though I recognise that it is a technique that the BBC prefers to undertake. Likewise I don’t, and have chosen to not make use of the vary of propaganda and indoctrination merchandise your company provides since 2019.
There are, as I’m certain you recognize, hundreds of thousands if not billions of firms internationally offering items and providers I don’t purchase or use. Are you able to think about the time it will take to jot down, phone or go surfing to each considered one of these companies to tell them that I are not looking for their merchandise? If that had been the case, no work would ever get finished, nobody would have any wages and there can be no BBC to harass the inhabitants with menaces and threats of imprisonment. Are you able to think about if each firm all through the UK had been to behave this fashion? I think about the courts can be busy and the jails can be full.
Nevertheless, within the spirit of fairness, I’ve determined that, the place the BBC leads I and lots of different firms ought to observe. Consequently I’ll bill you for non-use of my providers. I’ll proceed to ship these invoices on a month-to-month foundation with more and more threatening language and at last might resort to authorized motion. I’m certain you’re in settlement with this precept as it’s one you yourselves undertake.
Yours faithfully,
Tracy Jones
***
Expensive Editor
Simply to say effectively finished to you, Kathy, for making a stand and highlighting the totalitarian bullying from the TV Licensing mafia.
Increasingly of us are stopping our TV licence because the BBC turns into extra like a CCP propaganda channel.
We’re sick to the enamel of their bias, wokeness and disgusting behaviour through the plandemic.
Hopefully extra folks will observe your instance.
Michael Carr
***
The zero price of Internet Zero
Expensive Editor
Following on from Alwyn Davies’s letter final week, that is my comparable calculation: The focus of CO2 within the Earth’s ambiance is presently round 420 components per million, i.e. about 1 half per 2,400. Roughly 5 per cent of the atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic, ie 1 half per 48,000. The UK is chargeable for 1 per cent of this, ie 1 half per 4,800,000. So if we obtain Internet Zero by 2050 we can have decreased the focus of CO2 within the ambiance by 1 half in 4.8 million. What potential helpful impact will which have? And at what price?
Jerry Lanning
***
Police should get robust with eco-vandals
Expensive Editor
On Monday yet one more eco-demonstration, this time by Simply Cease Oil. This was an obvious try and disrupt the Altering of the Guard at Buckingham Palace. The eco-demonstrators are critically disrupting society, creating greenhouse gases and losing police time when the police must be fixing crime. Agency motion is required in opposition to the activists in Reasonably priced Vitality, Extinction Insurrection, Tyre Extinguishers, Insulate Britain, Simply Cease Oil, Animal Insurrection, The Fridays for Future Motion and different radical teams. The police should cease dancing and skateboarding with eco-demonstrators and asking these superglued to the highway if they’re comfy and would they like a glass of water or a cup of tea. Demonstrators must be arrested, spend the evening in jail after which be quick tracked early the subsequent morning into courtroom and sentenced. These on taxpayer-funded welfare advantages and Scottish college college students who get free schooling price £9,000 a yr, ought to have these funds suspended for a time frame depending on the severity of the offence.
Clark Cross
Linlithgow
***
The Earth is just not a greenhouse
Expensive Editor
Warming alarmists declare: ‘Earth’s ambiance acts just like the glass in a greenhouse.’ That is false.
Glass is essentially clear to incoming photo voltaic radiation which warms no matter is contained in the greenhouse. If the greenhouse had no partitions (just like the ambiance), warmed greenhouse air would rise by convection, escape out by way of the open sides, and heavy cooler air close to to the bottom would circulate in to take its place. This open ‘greenhouse’ would keep near exterior temperature.
What causes an actual greenhouse to heat is the strong clear roof and the closed partitions. The glass roof welcomes incoming photo voltaic radiation however the strong enclosure prevents this warmed inside air from escaping.
In an actual greenhouse, operators shut vents to forestall heat air from escaping (or open them after they want to decrease the within temperature). In addition they pump CO2 into their greenhouses to encourage plant progress (however the Greens wish to starve crops by limiting CO2).
The Earth’s ambiance has no agency roof or partitions. Photo voltaic heating on the floor simply causes that sizzling air to rise and it cools both by radiation or adiabatic enlargement. It’s changed by cooler air.
The Earth is just not a greenhouse.
Viv Forbes
Australia
***
Local weather change info to offer your MP
Expensive Editor
I AM encouraging these involved concerning the disastrous Internet Zero coverage to ship the next letter to their MP.
Roger Arthur
W Sussex
Expensive MP
We’re instructed that ‘most scientists’ agree on local weather change, however we are able to’t be certain of what query they had been requested, what number of had been certified to reply and what number of may lose their funding by giving the ‘flawed’ reply. However the local weather has all the time modified over time and that is certainly about figuring out the fundamental trigger(s) and how a lot people affect the local weather. So right here is an unambiguous query for you and for British scientists.
In 2020 the online international improve in atmospheric CO2 ranges rose from a 60-year common of 1.6 components per million (ppm) pa to 2.5ppm. That was 4,600 occasions the UK’s common annual emissions over that point. That’s based mostly on IPCC’s estimate that people contribute 3 per cent of the online annual improve and that the UK contributes 1 per cent of that 3 per cent. (Some take into account the three per cent determine to be excessive.)
Most of that 54 per cent improve in CO2 ranges (in 2020) was clearly as a consequence of pure (not human) emissions and it got here after a fall in human emissions, displaying the insignificance of the UK’s contribution.
In 12 days, China emits the identical quantity of CO2 because the UK does in a yr and is constructing 3 times extra coal-fired energy stations than the remainder of the world.
The UK has led the best way within the drive for Internet Zero with disastrous penalties, the price of vitality within the UK rising to round twice the typical for a Western nation. Blind pursuit of the coverage will additional improve gas poverty and the danger of energy cuts, whereas the additional price will increase will make British business much more uncompetitive.
So do you critically assume that paying round £5trillion (£200,000 per family) to win this international race to the underside is justified, when extra UK companies will transfer abroad solely to emit extra CO2 than earlier than?
Earlier than answering, recall i) that the solar is the first driver of local weather; ii) that there isn’t any international warming mannequin which elements in all drivers and suggestions loops; iii) that IPCC predictions have been flawed; iv) that pure CO2 ranges observe international temperature and v) that water vapour has an even bigger greenhouse influence than CO2.
I look ahead to your thought of response.
