I TAKE this second to induce you to cancel your Netflix subscription. We cancelled Disney, for apparent causes. The truth is, I consider we had been receiving Disney ‘free’ as a part of some telephone bundle, however we refused the free renewal because it had turn out to be unbearably woke. That’s how a lot I hate Disney proper now – you actually couldn’t give me the subscription.
We subscribed to Netflix early and I admit I loved a lot of their programming comparable to The Crown, Bridgerton, some older films and plenty of of their true crime documentaries. I attempted to dam out the ever extra woke content material and a few of its sexually express content material. Then my ladies began watching The Child-Sitters Membership. You bear in mind The Child-Sitters Membership, proper, these harmless books that had been round in my day and appeared utterly innocent?
Enter Netflix. The Child-Sitters Membership has obtained a woke makeover. In a single episode (which one way or the other I missed) one of many ladies, Mary Anne, babysits a boy, who now identifies as just a little woman, Bailey. How does she discover this out? Mary Anne goes to Bailey’s wardrobe, finds a number of denims and T-shirts, and says nicely, these received’t do. The little ‘woman’, who loves all issues princess, reveals her the extra lovely ladies’ garments, that are ‘her’ new garments.
‘These are my previous garments,’ the boy tells Mary Anne in a single scene. Confused, Mary Anne seeks out her good friend Daybreak, who tried to elucidate: ‘If somebody tried to make you do every part together with your left hand, it will be super-weird, proper? That’s how Bailey feels. The identical manner that you realize that you simply’re right-handed, Bailey is aware of she’s a lady . . . All of us need our outsides to match our insides.’
What recent hell is that this? Not solely does this programme push transgender ideology, it doesn’t even make any sense. So, we at the moment are to consider that ladies are to not have denims and T-shirts of their wardrobe any extra? We’re to simply accept that these garments are the truth is ineffective to younger Bailey? Is that what they’re saying?
I grew up within the 80s and 90s, and wore my older brother’s garments a good bit. My youthful daughter wears a few of her brother’s T-shirts – it will be a waste to not get additional use out of them. Even had been we to simply accept that Bailey is now a ‘woman’ (which I completely don’t) we’re additionally to simply accept that ‘she’ can’t put on any of her previous boys’ garments? That’s some severe stereotyping proper there.
This ridiculous programme demonstrates as soon as once more that the one manner this trans ideology works is should you settle for a hyper-stereotypical view of ladies and boys. This boy is now a lady, due to this fact can’t put on a T-shirt? Critically, are we returning to the Fifties or one thing? I consider this hyper-stereotyping of ladies’ roles is what the feminists object to essentially the most.
In case your little children may need missed the purpose, Mary Anne then lectures a pair of medical professionals in a hospital the place little ‘woman’ Bailey was admitted, on how they need to deal with the boy who’s the truth is a lady by the correct pronouns. She additionally calls for a hospital robe that isn’t blue – as a result of everyone knows that if you’re a lady or a lady sporting a blue hospital robe is simply not acceptable.
As I stated, it isn’t simply the trans ideology I object to, it’s the full and utter idiocy of the entire thing. The mind-blowing stupidity of the storyline is motive sufficient to cancel Netflix.
It’s unhealthy sufficient that this trans insanity is on the market preying on ladies and ladies to hurt their very own our bodies, and destroying feminine areas. However should you pay an organization to indoctrinate your children on this evil, the joke is on you.
