Monday, September 26, 2022
HomeWales WeatherWeekly Local weather and Vitality Information Roundup #521 – Watts Up With...

Weekly Local weather and Vitality Information Roundup #521 – Watts Up With That?


The Week That Was: 2022-09-24 (September 24, 2022)
Dropped at You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org)
The Science and Environmental Coverage Undertaking

Quote of the Week: “All are certain of their days besides essentially the most smart … He’s the wisest thinker who holds his idea with some doubt.” – Michael Faraday

Variety of the Week: Thrice

THIS WEEK:

By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Coverage Undertaking (SEPP)

Scope: The studies of the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC) exaggerate the affect of carbon dioxide on earth’s temperatures. This TWTW will handle the exaggerations on three ranges.

David Whitehouse of the World Warming Coverage Basis (GWPF) discusses a paper stating that aerosols are declining. Aerosols are a significant fudge issue utilized in IPCC local weather modeling. If aerosols are declining, then any enhance in floor temperatures could also be from a rise in photo voltaic radiation hitting the floor, not from a rise within the greenhouse impact.

Richard Lindzen produced a report for the GWPF titled “An Evaluation of the Typical World Warming Narrative.” It was critiqued by unbiased researcher Nic Lewis who has a background in inference statistics. The trade is efficacious.

The video of Howard Hayden’s presentation to the Medical doctors for Catastrophe Preparedness on “Physics the IPCC Ignores – However the local weather can’t” is on the market. Just a few key factors will likely be mentioned.

Dr Javier Vinós of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Andy Could have wrapped up their presentation of “The Winter Gatekeeper Speculation.” The Speculation will likely be mentioned in a subsequent TWTW. Nonetheless, a quote from Vinós bears particular point out: “’Alternatively, I feel I can safely say that no one understands local weather change.’ J. Vinós, paraphrasing Richard Feynman’s phrases about quantum mechanics.”

Melting glaciers have been within the information. Steven Koonin had a superb article within the Wall Avenue Journal on Antarctica and TWTW will fill in additional about Greenland and the Arctic.

The previous parliamentary under-secretary for Vitality, Science and Know-how, in New Zealand, Barry Brill offers fifty the reason why authorities local weather insurance policies want crucial pondering.

Senator Manchin launched particulars of his “deal” with Senator Schumer. It might profit his profession, however not a lot the American client.

The Workplace of Lawyer Normal for the State of New York has filed a civil go well with, not legal expenses, in opposition to Donald Trump and his household. Lawyer Francis Menton states this demonstrates the persevering with decline in integrity of the workplace, a decline discovered elsewhere.

*******************

Hiatus Continued? The studies of the IPCC depend on floor temperature measurements, that are closely influenced by human actions aside from carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These actions embody urbanization, draining of water and wetlands, and deforestation – all of which enhance temperatures. But local weather fashions usually are not adjusted to account for these actions and rising temperatures are blamed on rising atmospheric CO2. That is one purpose TWTW doesn’t respect research primarily based on rising floor temperatures. David Whitehouse discusses an article within the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physicsthat makes use of satellite tv for pc information to point out that concentrations of aerosol particles have decreased considerably since 2000.

Since aerosol particles trigger cooling (such because the volcanic exercise within the early a part of the atmospheric temperature development file), local weather modelers have made assumptions about aerosols to elucidate why the earth will not be warming as a lot as they’ve forecast. The summary of the Atmospheric Chemistry and Physicsarticle states:

“Anthropogenic aerosols exert a cooling affect that offsets a part of the greenhouse gasoline warming. As a result of their quick tropospheric lifetime of solely a number of days, the aerosol forcing responds shortly to emissions. Right here, we current and focus on the evolution of the aerosol forcing since 2000. There are a number of traces of proof that permit us to robustly conclude that the anthropogenic aerosol efficient radiative forcing (ERF) – each aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ERFaci) – has turn into much less damaging globally, i.e., the development in aerosol efficient radiative forcing modified signal from damaging to optimistic. Backside-up inventories present that anthropogenic main aerosol and aerosol precursor emissions declined in most areas of the world; observations associated to aerosol burden present declining tendencies, particularly of the fine-mode particles that make up many of the anthropogenic aerosols; satellite tv for pc retrievals of cloud droplet numbers present tendencies in areas with aerosol declines which can be in line with these in signal, as do observations of top-of-atmosphere radiation. Local weather mannequin outcomes, together with a revised set that’s constrained by observations of the ocean warmth content material evolution present a constant signal and magnitude for a optimistic forcing relative to the yr 2000 as a consequence of lowered aerosol results. This discount results in an acceleration of the forcing of local weather change, i.e., a rise in forcing by 0.1 to 0.3 W m−2, as much as 12 % of the full local weather forcing in 2019 in comparison with 1750 based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC).”

Whitehouse writes:

“The researchers estimate that the weakening of aerosol-induced temperature change between 2000 – 2019 is just like that estimated by the IPCC’s AR6. Most of this weakening occurred post-2010 coincident with the top of the so-called world warming hiatus interval. It means that maybe as much as 60% of the worldwide temperature enhance since then is right down to the discount of worldwide aerosols. [Boldface added]

“When taken along with a few super-strong El Nino occasions which briefly drove up world temperature (see graph beneath), the brand new findings recommend that the worldwide warming hiatus — clearly evident previous to 2014 — could not have ended but. If NASA’s satellite tv for pc information are confirmed, it might recommend that a lot of the very reasonable adjustments in world temperature this century could have been pushed primarily by cleaner air and naturally-occurring El Niños.”

Put extra merely: Within the 21st century, we aren’t experiencing the CO2-caused temperature will increase forecasted by world local weather modelers. The declare of a local weather emergency brought on by CO2 is an exaggeration. See hyperlinks below Difficult the Orthodoxy.

*******************

A 3-D Drawback With A 1-D Resolution? Richard S. Lindzen is Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, Emeritus on the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how. He’s famous for fixing complicated issues, puzzles as he calls them. His feedback on the complexity of “local weather change” in “An evaluation of the traditional world warming narrative” are noteworthy. Within the Evaluation he states:

“Though the gross inadequacy of our understanding of clouds and different components is brazenly acknowledged by the IPCC, issues over world warming are primarily based on what is actually the belief that variations in water vapor, clouds, and so forth act to amplify moderately than oppose the affect of CO₂; in different phrases, they’re assumed to be optimistic moderately than damaging feedbacks. It’s on the egregiousness of those assumptions moderately than on the greenhouse impact itself, that the majority sceptics (together with myself) have targeted.” [Emphasis in original]

Normal Circulation Fashions (currently referred to as World Local weather Fashions) “do particularly poorly are presenting the pure inside variability of the environment and the oceans, and nearly all of them fail to accurately anticipate adjustments within the generally used measure of worldwide temperature. Nor do they simulate previous climates adequately.”

The IPCC and its followers have tried to handle the multi-dimensional drawback of local weather change with a easy answer that’s improper – greenhouse gases. Amongst different points they ignore the complexity of convection by two fluids in movement rubbing in opposition to irregular surfaces. The summary states:

“The one-dimensional image of the greenhouse impact and the function of carbon dioxide on this mechanism dominates present depictions of local weather and world warming. We briefly evaluation this image. We then focus on the shortcomings of this strategy in coping with the three-dimensional local weather system. One drawback is figuring out what temperature on the true Earth corresponds to the temperature within the one-dimensional therapy. This, in flip, results in the normal recognition that the Earth has, in truth, many local weather regimes at current. Furthermore, there have been profound adjustments within the temperature distinction between the tropics and polar areas over millennia, however on the identical time the temperature of the tropical areas has remained little modified. The favored narrative assumes that small adjustments within the tropics are amplified at excessive latitudes. There is no such thing as a foundation for this assumption. Reasonably, the distinction is set by dynamic warmth fluxes within the environment and oceans, with the controlling flux as a consequence of baroclinic instability within the environment. Adjustments in imply temperature are primarily as a consequence of adjustments within the tropic-to-pole distinction, and to not adjustments within the greenhouse impact. The steadiness of tropical temperatures within the face of strongly various warmth fluxes out from these latitudes factors to the existence of robust damaging feedbacks within the radiative-convective response of the tropics. Lastly, we’ll touch upon the so-called impacts of local weather change. [Boldface added]

In a quick non-mathematical presentation, he handle points comparable to the favored narrative, what’s the Earth’s temperature?, what’s the Earth’s local weather?, what determines the tropics-pole temperature distinction?, what produces the steadiness of the tropical temperature?, the place does CO₂ match within the local weather?, and political impacts of the IPCC’s absurdly simplistic strategy to local weather change. Within the part “The place does this go away us?” Lindzen writes:

“This all leaves us with a quasi-religious motion predicated on an absurd ‘scientific’ narrative. The insurance policies invoked on behalf of this motion have led to the US hobbling its power system (a course of that has performed a outstanding function in inflicting present inflation), whereas lifting sanctions for Russia’s Nordstream 2 pipeline, which was designed to bypass the prevailing pipeline by way of Ukraine used to produce Germany. It has precipitated a lot of the European Union to ban exploitation of shale gasoline and different sources of fossil gasoline, thus leaving it with a lot greater power prices, elevated power poverty, and dependence on Russia, thus markedly decreasing its capacity to oppose Mr Putin’s aggressions.

“Except we get up to the absurdity of the motivating narrative, that is seemingly solely to be the start of the disasters that can observe from the present irrational demonization of CO₂. Altering course will likely be removed from a easy activity. As President Eisenhower famous in his farewell handle in 1961:

‘The prospect of domination of the nation’s students by Federal employment, venture allocations, and the ability of cash is ever current and is gravely to be regarded.

‘But, in holding scientific analysis and discovery in respect, as we should always, we should even be alert to the equal and reverse hazard that public coverage might itself turn into the captive of a scientific-technological elite.’

“As described intimately in Lindzen (2008, 2012), the US authorities dedicated itself to the present narrative by the early Nineteen Nineties and drastically elevated funding in consequence. Furthermore, given the dimensions of the power sector, any try to rebuild it, nevertheless unnecessarily and ineffectively, presents immense alternatives for enormous short-term income – alternatives which can be clearly tempting and strongly defended. Atop all of this, has been the fixed Goebellian repetition by the media of local weather alarm. And this alarm is accompanied by so-called ‘options’ that take care of one thing, specifically decarbonisation, that’s, in truth, largely irrelevant to local weather change, whereas imposing nice and pointless ache. [Boldface added]

“It’s important – to western civilization itself – that the hurt related to this completely unwarranted alarm be ended, nevertheless troublesome the duty.”

Nic Lewis has a considerate critique of Lindzen’s work. Nonetheless, Lindzen responds that Lewis makes use of a one-dimensional strategy in addressing the so-called water vapor suggestions. It is a widespread drawback because the 1979 Charney Report which supplied the premise for the claims of a warming from a doubling of CO2 discovered within the six IPCC studies. Lindzen cites the work of van Wijngaarden and Happer, which TWTW thinks addresses the difficulty of the warming affect from rising greenhouse gases higher than any work primarily based on the IPCC strategy. Lindzen concludes his response with:

“My paper represents my evaluation of how the local weather system really works. It’s the results of nearly 60 years of labor on the habits of the physics and dynamics of the environment, and the evolution of my pondering since Lindzen (1993). After all, like all of science, it’s unlikely to signify the ultimate phrase on the topic. Nonetheless, I’m fairly assured that the present well-liked narrative is essentially incorrect. The notion that the science is ‘settled’ is fairly implausible in both case.” [Boldface added] See hyperlink below Difficult the Orthodoxy

*******************

Physics Ignored: In his presentation on the 40th Annual Assembly of the Medical doctors for Catastrophe Preparedness, AMO physicist Howard Hayden addressed a few of the physics the IPCC ignores. Hayden has prolonged the work of van Wijngaarden and Happer on the greenhouse impact. The presentation is now obtainable on video.

In his presentation Hayden develops the idea of Planetary Warmth Stability, which is Outgoing Longwave Radiation (infrared radiation) equal to Incoming Photo voltaic Radiation (daylight) much less the mirrored portion equilibrium. For all planets, this equation doesn’t change except daylight adjustments or the albedo (the reflectivity) of the planet adjustments.

Hayden then goes into the well-established Stefan-Boltzmann Legislation which applies to all black-bodies comparable to many of the earth’s floor.  The blackbody radiation from the floor is absorbed by greenhouse gases at their very own wavelength bands, so the radiation to house is unquestionably not blackbody radiation. An important a part of the Stefan-Boltzmann Legislation is the connection between absolute temperature and whole quantity of radiation in any respect wavelengths. (Astronomers often use the Stefan-Boltzmann regulation for stars; gases at 1000’s of levels do certainly have a blackbody spectrum for essentially the most half.)

The second most vital a part of the Stefan-Boltzmann Legislation is that for a black physique, the full quantity of emitted radiation for all wavelengths is proportional to the fourth energy of absolute temperature (°Ok). A small enhance in floor temperature can have a dramatic impact on radiation from the floor.

The third most vital half is that there’s a fixed, referred to as the Stefan-Boltzmann fixed. [Boldface added]

Hayden then combines planetary warmth steadiness, the greenhouse impact, and the Stefan-Boltzmann equation into one equation that should be balanced by all planets at equilibrium with the star they orbit (see his essays on Primary Local weather Physics posted on the SEPP web site).  He reveals how IPCC’s fashions fail to steadiness the equation.

See hyperlinks below Difficult the Orthodoxy and http://www.sepp.org/science_papers.cfm

*******************

Melting “Doomsday” Fears: Writing within the Wall Avenue Journal, physicist Steven Koonin addresses the so-called Doomsday Glacier in “Don’t Consider the Hype About Antarctica’s Melting Glaciers.” Koonin writes:

“Alarming studies that the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking misrepresent the science below method to perceive a really complicated scenario. Antarctica has been ice-covered for a minimum of 30 million years. The ice sheet holds about 26.5 million gigatons of water (a gigaton is a billion metric tons, or about 2.2 trillion kilos). If it had been to soften fully, sea ranges would rise 190 ft. Such a change is many millennia sooner or later, if it comes in any respect.

“Rather more modest ice loss is regular in Antarctica. Annually, some 2,200 gigatons (or 0.01%) of the ice is discharged within the type of soften and icebergs, whereas snowfall provides nearly the identical quantity. The distinction between the discharge and addition every year is the ice sheet’s annual loss. That determine has been rising in latest many years, from 40 gigatons a yr within the Nineteen Eighties to 250 gigatons a yr within the 2010s.

“However the enhance is a small change in a posh and extremely variable course of. For instance, Greenland’s annual loss has fluctuated considerably over the previous century. And whereas the Antarctic losses appear stupendously giant, the latest annual losses quantity to 0.001% of the full ice and, in the event that they continued at that price, would elevate sea stage by solely 3 inches over 100 years.”

Koonin then goes into particulars on two new research which have been exaggerated within the basic press earlier than concluding:

“These two research illustrate the progress being made in understanding a dauntingly complicated mixture of ice, ocean, land, and climate, with intelligent strategies to deduce previous circumstances and complex pc modeling to point out potential future eventualities. These papers describe the science with acceptable precision and caveats, however it’s a disgrace that the media misrepresents the analysis to lift alarm. That denies the general public the precise to make knowledgeable choices about “local weather motion,” in addition to the chance to marvel on the science itself.”

An analogous drawback happens with the reporting of the Greenland Ice Sheet. The reporters look like blind to Camp Century, which was in use from 1959 to 1967. It was a preliminary facility for the US Military venture Iceworm to put in a community of intermediate vary nuclear missiles able to hitting the Soviet Union. Camp Century had full trendy rest room, eating, and medical amenities, all powered by a nuclear reactor. Inside just a few years, it grew to become evident that the ice was transferring, and the camp was deserted with the nuclear reactor eliminated.

One stable scientific accomplishment got here from the ice core borings which prompted the Greenland Ice Core Undertaking (GRIP) by the European Science Basis from 1989 to 1995 on the peak of the ice sheet. These revealed that abrupt local weather change occurred greater than 25 instances because the final glacial interval. Named after palaeoclimatologists Willi Dansgaard and Hans Oeschge, the Dansgaard- Oeschge (DO) occasions present an abrupt warming adopted by a gradual cooling roughly each 1,500 years. These usually are not as clear in ice cores taken in Antarctica and are presumably brought on by adjustments within the North Atlantic Circulation. See Article #1 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DansgaardpercentE2percent80percent93Oeschger_event

*******************

Essential Considering Wanted: WUWT posted a listing by Barry Brill with fifty the reason why power insurance policies of developed nations have to be rigorously thought out. Among the many causes is that the idea of Internet Zero by 2050 is delusional. This record doesn’t go into the absurdity of UN IPCC studies and the one-dimensional pondering they signify. See hyperlink below Science, Coverage, and Proof.

*******************

The Deal: Senator Joe Manchin launch particulars of his take care of Senator Schumer. In response to the evaluation by The Wall Avenue Journal Manchin will get his Mountain Valley Pipeline, however there’s not a lot for shoppers and taxpayers. The evaluation outlines a few of the undesirable attribute of the “tax enhance and local weather spending invoice” Manchin voted for.

“The President must designate 25 power initiatives of strategic nationwide significance, however solely 5 should be for fossil fuels or biofuels comparable to ethanol. Federal businesses could be directed to attempt to full environmental opinions on these initiatives inside two years, however nothing compels businesses to satisfy these deadlines. Tasks the President doesn’t favor might languish in regulatory purgatory.

“The invoice units a 150-day statute of limitations on authorized challenges to environmental opinions and permits, which is meant to stop activists from suing to cease initiatives below building. But nothing limits the scope of authorized challenges and who can deliver them. The invoice makes no substantive adjustments to the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act, Clear Water Act, Clear Air Act, and Endangered Species Act that permit opponents delay initiatives for years.

“Mr. Manchin additionally comes up quick in addressing the issue of states abusing their authority below the Clear Water Act. The invoice would give states one yr to take motion on water permits. However nothing stops Governors from rejecting permits on false environmental pretenses as some habitually do.

“Worse, the invoice would broaden state discretion to dam oil and gasoline pipelines primarily based on an evaluation of a venture’s oblique affect on water high quality as an alternative of merely discharges into waterways as below present regulation. States would have an even bigger veto on power initiatives and federal environmental opinions.

“The invoice’s worst provision would give new energy to the Federal Vitality Regulatory Fee to override state objections to increasing electrical transmission traces. States can now deny permits for interstate transmission traces that received’t profit their residents. This will generally damage states that want the power to steadiness their grids.

“The invoice lets FERC override states and approve transmission traces within the ‘nationwide curiosity’ in the event that they ‘improve the power of amenities that generate or transmit agency or intermittent power to connect with the electrical grid.’ This explicitly ties the nationwide curiosity to ‘intermittent’ renewable energy sources.”

Unreliable electrical energy is within the nationwide curiosity? See Article # 2 and The Political Video games Proceed.

*******************

The Mouse: After years of labor and numerous manhours New York’s Lawyer Normal produced a mouse in opposition to Donald Trump. It sued Trump over a civil grievance – he overstated the worth of private belongings. Francis Menton discusses the downward spiral of the AG’s workplace for greater than 20 years. The workplace has turn into extremely politicized, shedding its fame for integrity. The identical will be stated for a lot of different AG places of work. For instance, instantly after finishing his time period of workplace as Governor, Bob McDonnell of Virginia was indicted then convicted of corruption with no clear crime. He was sentenced to jail, however appealed all the way in which to the Supreme Courtroom, which unanimously overturned the conviction asking the place is the crime?

As acknowledged within the Wall Avenue Journal regarding the Trump grievance:

“Ms. James ran for workplace promising to indict Mr. Trump, which is the alternative of the way in which justice needs to be accomplished. You’re presupposed to discover a crime after which determine the perpetrator. Ms. James declared Mr. Trump might ‘be indicted for legal offenses’ and has hunted ever since for a criminal offense to cost him with.

“Her civil lawsuit requires a mere preponderance of proof customary to show guilt, not proof past an inexpensive doubt. She has referred the case to the Inside Income Service and federal prosecutors in Manhattan, although the Manhattan district legal professional didn’t file expenses after inspecting the identical points.

This isn’t to dismiss the monetary fraud expenses. The lawsuit says Mr. Trump used ‘objectively false numbers to calculate property values,’ together with counting his Trump Tower condo at 30,000 sq. ft. when it was 10,996 sq. ft. in order that it may very well be improperly valued at $327 million. His golf course in Scotland was valued at $327 million on the calculation that 2,500 properties may very well be developed (value $267 million) when he had zoning approval for just one,500 properties and flats.”

To which Haapala commented within the digital model of the article:

“For many of his skilled life, Donald Trump was a blowhard actual property developer who exaggerated the worth of his properties. Now the NY AG has declared that he dedicated fraud.

“Many local weather ‘consultants’ are blowhard ‘scientists’ who exaggerated the affect of carbon dioxide on local weather. The place does that place the state and native AGs who’ve sued oil corporations primarily based on blowhard predictions of the affect of carbon dioxide?” See Litigation Points and Article # 3.

*******************

Variety of the Week: Thrice: The IPCC studies state that the affect of doubling CO2 on temperatures will likely be 3 °C plus or minus 1.5 °C. The bodily proof is indicating that the affect will likely be about 1 °C. Thus, IPCC numbers overestimate the affect by 3 instances., roughly the identical quantity as Trump exaggerated the dimensions of his condo (2.7 instances).

Censorship

Fb spied on non-public messages of Individuals who questioned 2020 election

By Miranda Devine, New York Submit, Sep 14, 2022 [H/t Jo Nova]

https://nypost.com/2022/09/14/facebook-spied-on-private-messages-of-americans-who-questioned-2020-election/

Researchers Hit With Lawsuits, Information Requests for Truth-Checking Local weather Claims

Researchers say the calls for, some from teams with fossil gasoline ties, try to muzzle their voices.

By Margi Murphy, Bloomberg, Sep 19, 2022

https://www.bloomberg.com/information/articles/2022-09-19/climate-fact-checkers-hit-with-lawsuits-foias-for-challenging-dubious-claims?leadSource=uverifypercent20wall

[SEPP Comment: What about groups with green ties?]

Difficult the Orthodoxy — NIPCC

Local weather Change Reconsidered II: Bodily Science

Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental Worldwide Panel on Local weather Change (NIPCC), 2013

Abstract: https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/paperwork/CCR/CCR-II/Abstract-for-Policymakers.pdf

Local weather Change Reconsidered II: Organic Impacts

Idso, Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental Worldwide Panel on Local weather Change (NIPCC), 2014

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/climate-change-reconsidered-ii-biological-impacts/

Abstract: https://www.heartland.org/media-library/pdfs/CCR-IIb/Abstract-for-Policymakers.pdf

Local weather Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels

By A number of Authors, Bezdek, Idso, Legates, and Singer eds., Nongovernmental Worldwide Panel on Local weather Change, April 2019

http://retailer.heartland.org/store/ccr-ii-fossil-fuels/

Obtain with no cost:

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Local weather-Change-Reconsidered-II-Fossil-Fuels-FULL-Quantity-with-covers.pdf

Why Scientists Disagree About World Warming

The NIPCC Report on the Scientific Consensus

By Craig D. Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer, Nongovernmental Worldwide Panel on Local weather Change (NIPCC), Nov 23, 2015

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/

Obtain with no cost:

https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/why-scientists-disagree-about-global-warming

Nature, Not Human Exercise, Guidelines the Local weather

S. Fred Singer, Editor, NIPCC, 2008

http://www.sepp.org/publications/nipcc_final.pdf

World Sea-Stage Rise: An Analysis of the Knowledge

By Craig D. Idso, David Legates, and S. Fred Singer, Heartland Coverage Transient, Could 20, 2019

Difficult the Orthodoxy

An evaluation of the traditional world warming narrative

By Richard Lindzen, Remark by Nic Lewis, GWPF, 2022 [H/t Paul Homewood]

https://www.thegwpf.org/content material/uploads/2022/09/Lindzen-global-warming-narrative.pdf?mc_cid=d5f95de4d7&mc_eid=4961da7cb1

Physics the IPCC Ignores – However the local weather can’t

Howard Hayden, PhD speaks on the fortieth Annual Assembly of Medical doctors for Catastrophe Preparedness, on August 15, 2022., Sep 18, 2022

https://rumble.com/v1kipll-physics-the-ipcc-ignores-but-the-climate-cannot.html

Video

World temperature hiatus could not have ended in any case, new research suggests

By David Whitehouse, Internet Zero Watch, Sep 23, 2022

Hyperlink to paper; Strong proof for reversal of the development in aerosol efficient local weather forcing

By Johannes Quaas, et al, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Sep 21, 2022

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12221/2022/

Press Launch: Necessary new paper challenges IPCC’s claims about local weather sensitivity

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of Individuals Know That, Sep 20, 2022

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments